Module 2 · Reading a Level With Every Tool
The Four-Layer Read
What each tool tells you when price reaches your level.
In this lesson you'll
- Run the four-layer read at a level
- Know what each tool contributes
- Combine them into one judgment
Price has reached a mapped level. Now you read it with each confirmation tool — each answers a different sub-question:
- Heatmap (resting liquidity): is there a wall defending the level? Does it hold as price arrives, or pull?
- Footprint (executed aggression): is there absorption (heavy volume, no progress), a stacked imbalance (one side dominating), or exhaustion (shrinking volume at the extreme)?
- Delta / CVD (net flow): is there a divergence — price pushing one way while net aggressive flow goes the other?
- DOM / tape (live interaction): is the wall actually being traded into and holding? Are offers pulling while bids stack (or vice versa)?
Key takeaways
- Heatmap = resting liquidity (wall holds or pulls).
- Footprint = executed aggression (absorption / imbalance / exhaustion).
- Delta / CVD = net flow (divergence).
- DOM / tape = live interaction (wall traded into, stacking/pulling).
Check your understanding
Pick an answer to reveal instant feedback. Answer every question to complete the lesson.
Why that's off: Resting walls are the heatmap layer.
Why that's off: Pulling is read on the heatmap/DOM, not the footprint.
Why that's off: Fair value is context (volume profile), not the footprint.
The footprint shows EXECUTED aggression at each price — absorption, imbalances, exhaustion. Resting liquidity is the heatmap; live pulling is the DOM; fair value is the profile.
Why that's off: One layer alone is weak; agreement is the point.
Why that's off: Conflict means stand aside, not act.
Why that's off: Using all four layers together is the whole method.
Conviction comes from agreement: when every layer tells the same story at the level, the read is strong. Conflicting layers are a reason to stand aside.
Educational content only. Nothing here is financial or trading advice. Order-flow and options patterns shift probabilities; they never guarantee outcomes.
